After applying a distraction technique, what should the officer do?

After applying a distraction technique, the officer should attempt the release and stun again. This approach is rooted in the tactical principle that distraction techniques are designed to create an opportunity for effective control over a situation. By attempting a release and stun again, the officer can capitalize on the confusion or disorientation that the distraction has caused, thereby increasing the likelihood of regaining control over the individual or situation.

This method aligns with the dynamic nature of confrontations, where an immediate follow-up after a disruption can be critical to outcome success. Taking decisive action after employing a distraction ensures that the momentary advantage does not slip away and can enhance the officer’s ability to manage a threat safely and effectively.

Other options, while they might seem reasonable in different contexts, do not leverage the immediate advantages gained through the distraction technique as effectively. For instance, retreating and regrouping could allow the situation to escalate again or give the subject time to recover. Informing a dispatcher might be necessary in some situations but would not address the immediate tactical needs after the distraction. Initiating further negotiation could also be appropriate, but it may not take full advantage of the brief opening created by the distraction maneuver.